“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.”
— Mark Twain

Joel Bowman, writing today from Waterford, Ireland

Every place has its stories, its myths, its collective narratives…and its own rules and regulations to preserve it. Even here, in rainy ol’ southern Ireland…

When we last left you, we were ruminating about the ongoing electoral circus in the United States. Barring any unforeseen turn of events, it will be a showdown between Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton (D) and Donald John Trump (R).

Hill Rod vs. Don John.

The event, we concluded, is a giant farce…albeit a highly entertaining one. The situation is hopeless, as a dear friend likes to say, but not at all serious.

As expected, some readers took umbrage with our modest suggestion that the system was probably rigged…and that voting might not change anything anyway.

Of course, that last statement shouldn’t be at all controversial. Math whizzes have crunched the numbers. Statistically speaking, one man’s vote is meaningless.

That the act of voting itself might bring him comfort or inspire feelings of solidarity with his fellow man is another thing entirely. One can draw comfort from an honest day’s work…solidarity from a community group…a book club…a knitting circle.

No need to muddy one’s hands with the grubby world of politics.

Democracy was born in Ancient Greece…not long before their greatest philosopher, Socrates, was sentenced to death…by majority vote.

As for the widely held proposition that the democratic process improves the lot of the average man, just look at the evidence!

The current president ran on a platform of “hope and change.” He was supposed to stand up against “the system,” to look out for the “man on the street,” to fight for the common worker, the down and outer, to champion those left behind.

Well, then? After eight years in office, and the largest ever transfer of wealth from Main Street (mostly from retirees and those dependent on fixed income investments) to Wall Street, what are we to make of the promised “change?”

Have the drone wars come to an end? Has the Federal Reserve been audited…or shuttered? Has the government stopped snooping through your personal data, tracking your emails, bugging your telephone calls?

No, no, and…no.

Rather, these nefarious practices—and many others besides—have only increased under the administration of the current, elected government.

Besides all that, if democracy was all it’s cracked up to be, surely those who advocate for it would have more to show for their efforts than the two most hated candidates in history.

According to the polls, more than one in three voters say they “strongly disagree” with Mrs. Clinton. That figure would be enough to make her the most disliked candidate in history…were it not for the presumptive, Republican-Party nominee opposing her.

More than half (53%) of voters say they “strongly disagree” with Mr. Trump.

Hey! Wait a minute…

What kind of popularity contest is this? One in which between a third and a half of the population are guaranteed to harbor “strong” negative feelings against the winner?

It’s even possible, given current polling data, that a majority of the population could end up living under an unelected (by them) candidate.

Is that what they call “power to the people?” Or a government “of the people, by the people and for the people?”

Hmm…

In Argentina, back in the 2003 election, Néstor Kirchner won the presidency with a mere 22.2% of the first round vote. His main rival, Carlos Menem, managed to secure only 24.4%. He, at least, had the decency to drop out of the race.

When Néstor assumed office in May of that year, four in five people found themselves living with a president they couldn’t bring themselves to vote for…but whose edicts they now had to obey regardless.

The situation in the U.S. is not quite there yet. But it’s headed in that direction. Give it time…

Not that “majority-unelected” leaders are anything new.

In Australia, two of the last three prime ministers came to power via quasi coup d’états (that is, they took over their parties from within, by internal ballots, after the elected leader began polling badly with the general electorate).

And now, voters there are being “summoned” to the ballots again…possibly to elect someone else who will be dethroned by an member of their own party.

Malcolm Turnbull, who “won” the top job by knifing his predecessor, Brutus style, is calling for a general election in early July.

Australia, like Argentina, enforces mandatory voting. Citizens who choose not to show up on the day are liable to pay a fine…and possible face a day in court.

Only 12 other states in the world enforce this kind of nonsense. Among these beacons of civil liberties: The Indian state of Gujarat, the tiny island nation of Nauru and, of course, North Korea.

In other words, citizens of these states are not even allowed to choose whether or not they wish to participate in the process. It’s validation of the system by decree.

Think about that for a second…

Imagine you were forced to buy a new car every two years. And there were only two viable manufacturers.

Now, maybe you don’t want a car. Maybe you prefer to walk. Maybe you ride a bicycle. Maybe you prefer to take the bus. Or maybe you just have something better to do that particular day…like minding your own business.

What signal would your purchase send to the auto-manufacturing sector?

Build more cars! Exactly the opposite of what you want!

In a voluntary market, when people don’t show up to buy things, providers of those goods and services either get the hint (i.e. they make better stuff at more competitive prices)…or they go out of business. Then, that capital is unlocked to satisfy natural market demands for things people actually want.

Not so in a “compulsory market.”

Even DonJohn and HillRod could run in Australia and, no matter how much the population despised them, they could still expect close to a 100% voter turnout. (In the last federal election Down Under, 94% of registered voters went to the polls.)

Talk about manufactured consent!

At least in the U.S. voters have the freedom to do something meaningful on election day. Like trim the hedges…clean out the garage…or take their mother-in-laws out for lunch.

As mentioned above, each place has their own myths and imagined narratives…and their own regulatory framework to preserve the status quo.

Here at the Granville Hotel in Waterford, Ireland, they serve their breakfast oatmeal with whiskey and Baileys.

We don’t make the rules, Truth & Plenty reader. But surely some are worth following more than others?

Until next time…

Image ©iStock/YinYang

T&P Tool Shed

Oat Cuisine

By the Staff of Truth & Plenty

The humble bowl of oatmeal is the poster boy for a healthy breakfast. It’s filling, high in fiber, linked to numerous health benefits, and just boring enough that you know it has to be good for you.

If, like us, you want the benefits of this heart-healthy superfood, but prefer something with more flavor in the morning, you should try out these tasty variants on the classic bowl of oats and milk.

Savory Spinach: Roasted almonds and pumpkin seeds, spinach leaves (cook in the oatmeal), olive oil, garlic, and lemon juice.
Eggs Avocado: Kale, avocado, poached egg, chili flakes, and salt.
Banana Bowl: Honey, brown sugar, chopped walnuts, and banana slices.
Kentucky Special: Shot of bourbon, crispy bacon, toasted pecans, and maple syrup (this one isn’t as good for your heart as the others but it’s definitely the most fun).

Get Your Free Homesteading Report Here

Sign up here for our free Truth & Plenty e-letter and we’ll immediately send you a FREE research report on Homesteading: Find Out How to Start ‘Homesteading’ and Live Off the Land.

Three times weekly you’ll receive our very best ideas on how to become financially, geographically and intellectually independent.

Get Your Free Report on Homesteading

We will collect and handle your personal information in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
You can cancel your subscription at any time.